HubCommandersCardsDecksThemesKeywordsSetsArticles
Sign inSign up
Sign inSign up

Mythicwyrm is unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Fan Content Policy. Not approved/endorsed by Wizards of the Coast. Portions of the materials used are property of Wizards of the Coast. © Wizards of the Coast LLC.

AboutArticlesContactTermsPrivacyAffiliate Disclosurev0.1.0

© 2026 Mythicwyrm. All rights reserved.

Send to Sleep
Price$0.08 – $0.10
Buy on TCGplayer

Send to Sleep

{1}{U}

Instant

LegalRank #18,629

Tap up to two target creatures.

Spell mastery — If there are two or more instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard, those creatures don't untap during their controllers' next untap steps.

KeywordsSpell mastery

Why is this card good?

Wyrm hasn't broken down this card yet — check back soon.

Related cards

Wyrm hasn't mapped related cards for this one yet — check back soon.

Printings (2)

plstThe List · #ORI-71C$0.10Buy
oriMagic Origins · #71C$0.08Buy

Rulings (4)

  • 2015-06-22

    If the spell mastery ability applies and a creature affected by Send to Sleep changes controllers before its old controller’s next untap step, Send to Sleep will prevent it from becoming untapped during its new controller’s next untap step.

  • 2015-06-22

    Send to Sleep can target tapped creatures. If a targeted creature is already tapped when the spell resolves (and the spell mastery ability applies), that creature remains tapped and doesn’t untap during its controller’s next untap step.

  • 2015-06-22

    If you chose two targets and one is an illegal target when Send to Sleep resolves, that creature won’t become tapped and it won’t be stopped from untapping during its controller’s next untap step (if the spell mastery ability applies). It won’t be affected by Send to Sleep in any way.

  • 2015-06-22

    Check to see if there are two or more instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard as the spell resolves to determine whether the spell mastery ability applies. The spell itself won’t count because it’s still on the stack as you make this check.

Discussion (0)